European Integration and Russian Orthodoxy: Two Multiple Modernities Perspectives
Keywords:
multiple modernities, Habermas, european integration, Russian Orthodoxy, post-secularismAbstract
This article introduces a distinction in the paradigm of multiple modernities between a comparativecivilizational and a post-secular perspective. It argues that the first, comparative-civilizational perspective, helps to understand modernization-processes in large cultural-civilizational units; whereas the second, postsecular viewpoint, focuses on actors and cultural domains within civilizational units and on intercivilizational crossovers. The two perspectives are complementary. What we gain from this distinction is greater precision in the use of multiple modernities for explaining the place of religion in modern societies. The example of Russian Orthodoxy is used for clarifying the difference between these two perspectives: whereas from a comparative-civilizational viewpoint, Russian Orthodoxy may appear as Europe's 'other'; from a postsecular viewpoint, Orthodox religion is part of Europe's religious pluralist landscape and partakes in an ongoing process of defining the meaning of European political and cultural integration.Downloads
References
Данная статья написана по итогам научного семинара „Множественные современности и глобальное постсекулярное общество", который прошел 4 -6 мая 2011 года в Университете Тор Вергата (Рим). Английская версия данной статьи появится в сборнике: Multiple Modernities and Postsecular Societies/Eds. Massimo Rosati and Kristina StoeckI. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012 (Foethcoming). Права на публикацию статьи предоставлены издательством Ashgate/
См. также определение в: Katzenstein Peter J. Lodernities as Limits to Secular Europeanization? // Timothi A. Byrnes and Peter J. Multiple Modernities as Limits to Secular Europeanization? // European Journal of Social Theory. 2009. Vol. 12 (3). P. 358-74.
Byrnes T.A., Kutzenstein P. (eds.). Religion in an Expanding Europe Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006/
Ibid.
Müller O. Religion in Central and Eastern Europe: Was There a Re- Awakeningafter the Breakdown of Communism? // Detlef Pollackand Daniel V. A. Olson (eds.). The Role of Religion in Modern Socities. New York, London: Routledge, 2008. P. 70. См. также: Inglehart. R., Norris P. Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. CBBBambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. 111 - 132; Greeley A. AReligious Revival in Russia? // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1994. Vol. 33 (3). P. 253 - 272.
Davis D. Editorial: Russias New Law on Religion: Progress or Regress?//Journal of Churchand State. 1997. Vol. 39. P. 645 -656.
Ramet S. P. The Way We Were -and Should Be Again? European Orthodox Churches and the «Idyllic Past»//Timothy A. Byrnes and Peter J. Katzenstein (eds.). Religion in an ExpandingEurope. P. 148 -175.
Оба документа доступны на официальном веб-сайте Московского Патриархата: http://www.patriarchia.ru/
Uertz R.S., Lars P. (Hrsg.) Beginn einer neunen Ära? Die Sozialdoktrin der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche vom August 2000 im interkulturellen Dialog. Moskau: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung e. V., 2004. S. 95.
Kostjuk K. Die Sozialdoktrin - Herausforderungfür die Tradition und die Theologie der Orthodoxie // Rudolf Uertz and Lars Peter Schmidt (Hrsg.). Beginn einer neuen Ära? S. 67 - 74; Kostjuk K. Die Sozialdoktrin der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche: Schritt zur Zivilgesellschaft oder Manifest des orthodoxen Konservatismus? // Rudolf Uertz and Josef Thesing (Hrsg.). Die Grundlagen der Sozialdoktrin der Russisch- Orthodoxen Kirche. Deutsche Übersetzungmit Einführungund Kommentar. Sankt Auustin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftunge. V., 2001. S. 174 - 196.
Agadjanian A. Breakthrough to Modernity, Apologia for Traditionalism: the Russian Orthodox View of Society and Culture in Comparative Perspective//Religion, State and Society. 2003. Vol. 31 (4). P. 327-346/
Uertz R.S., Lars P. (Hrsg.) Beginn einer neuen Ära?
Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev (Алфеев Г.В.) Архиерейский Собор Русской Православной Церкви 2000 года: обзор основых деяний (The Council of the Russian Orthodox Churchin the year 2000: an overview over the main issues)//Jonathan Sutton and Wil van den Bercken (eds.). Orthodox Christianity and Contemporary Europe. Leuven, Paris, Dudley: Peeters, 2003. P. 249 -270.
Как я показала в другом месте: Stoeckl K. Political Hesychasm? Vladimir Petrunins Neo-Byzantine Interpretation of the Social Doctrine of the Russian Orthodox Church//Studies in East European Thought. 2010. Vol. 62 (1). P. 125 -133.
Agadjanian A. Russian Orthodox Vision of Human Rights//Vasilios Makrides (Hrsg.). Erfurter Vorträge zur Kulturgeschichte des Orthodoxen Christentums. Erfurt: niversität (Erfurt Religionswissenschaft Orthodoxes Christentum: 26), 2008. S. 14.
bid. P. 15.
Ibid. P. 18.
Ibid.
Кирилл, митрополит Смоленский и Калининградский. Права человека и нравственная ответственность. Выступление на X Всемирном Русском Народном Соборе (http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/102 261.html).
Eisenstadt S.N. The Reconstruction of Religious Arenas in the Framework of "Multiple Modernities" // Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2000. Vol. 29 (3). P. 591 - 611; Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple Modernities // Daedalus. 2000. Vol. 129 (1). P. 1-29; Eisenstadt S.N. Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2003; Eisenstadt S.N., Schluchter W. Introduction: Paths to Early Modernities. A. Comparative View // Daedalus. 1998. Vol. 127 (3). P. 1- 18.
Eisenstadt S.N. Introduction: The Axial Age Breakthroughs -Their Characteristics and Origins//S. N. Eisenstadt (ed.). The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations. Albany: State University of New YorkPress, 1986. P. 1.
Casanova J. Religion, European Secular Identities, and European Integration//Peter J. Katzenstein and Timothy A. Byrnes (eds.). Religion in an ExpandingEurope. P. 65 -92.
Byrnes T.A., Katzenstein P. (eds.). Religion in an Expanding Europe.
Spohn W. Europeanization, Religion and Collective Identities in an EnlargingEurope: AMultiple Modernities Perspective. P. 360.
Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple Modernities. P. 22.
Spohn W. Europeanization, Religion and Collective Identities in an EnlargingEurope: AMultiple Modernities Perspective. P. 362.
Knöbl W. PathDependency and Civilizational Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Theoretical Tasks//European Journal of Social Theory. 2010. Vol. 13 (1). P. 93.
Arnason J.P. Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
Knöbl W. Path Dependency and Civilizational Analysis. P. 93.
Arnason J. P. Civilizations in Dispute. P. 5.
Wagner P. Palomars Question. The Axial Age Hypotesis, European Modernity and Historical Contingency//Johann P. Arnason, S. N. Eisenstadt and Björn Wittrock(eds.). Axial Civilizatoins and World History. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2005. P. 100.
Byrnes T.A., Katzenstein P. (eds.). Religion in an Expanding Europe. P. 296.
в особенности статью Хосе Казановы (ссылка в прим. 23).
Byrnes T. A., Katzenstein P. (eds.). Religion in an Expanding Europe. P. 2.
Ibid.
Casanova J. Secularization//Neil J. Smelser and Paul B.Baltes (eds.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam, Paris et. al.: Elsevier, 2001.
Habermas J. Religion in the Public Sphere//European Journal of Philosophy. 2006. Vol. 14 (1). P. 1 -25 [рус. пер.: Хабермас Ю. Религия и публичность//Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. М.: Весь мир, 2011].
Например: Rawls J. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited // The University of Chicago Law Review. 1997. Vol. 64 (3). P. 765 - 807; Walzer M. Drawingthe line. Religion and Politics // ThinkingPolitically: Essays in Political Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007. P. 147 - 167; Audi R. Religious commitment and secular reason. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press, 1996; Habermas J. Between naturalism and religion: philosophical essays. Cambridge: Polity, 2008 [Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. М.: Весь мир, 2011]; Habermas J., Mendieta E. Apostsecular world society? An Interview withJürgen Habermas (2010)//The Immanent Frame. Secularism, religion, and the public sphere. Social Science Research Council Blog.
Habermas J. Religion in the Public Sphere. P. 13 [рус. пер.: Цит. соч. С. 131].
Ibid. P. 14 [рус. пер.: там же. С. 131 -132].
Ibid. [рус. пер.: там же].
Более негативная оценка: Agadjanian A. Liberal Individual and Christian Culture: Russian Orthodox Teachingon Human Rights in Social Theory Perspective//Religion, State, and Society. 2010. Vol. 38 (2). P. 97 -113; более позитивная: Thesing J., Uertz R. (Hrsg.). Die Grundlagen der Sozialdoktrin der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche. Deutsche Übersetzungmit Einführungund Kommentar. Sankt Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftunge. V., 2001.
Алфеев Г.В. Христианство перед вызовом воинствующего секуляризма // Церковь и время. 2004. № 2 (27). С. 26.
Habermas J. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993; Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Habermas J. Religion in the Public Sphere. P. 10 -11 [рус. пер.: С. 126 -127].
Habermas J. The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy // The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001. P. 58 - 112. См. также: Kratochwil F., Barbato M. Towards a Post-secular Political order? // European Political Science Review. 2009. Vol. 1 (3). P. 317 - 340.
Habermas J., Mendieta E. Apostsecular world society?
Ibid.
Habermas J. Remarks on Legitimation throughHuman Rights. P. 129.
Neumann B. Uses of the Other. «The East» in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN PCJTRH
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
