The Dialogue of Science and Religion from the Perspective of Contemporary Theories of Democracy

Authors

  • Uzlaner Dmitry Центр изучения религии и общества , Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ Автор

Keywords:

religion and science, Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, public religion, post-secular society, deliberative democracy

Abstract

This article deals with the dialogue between science and religion through the lens of contemporary theories of democracy. Can religion, along with science, make valuable contributions to the public debate? Should scientific community respect this contribution, and if yes, then why? The article analyzes the two general considerations in favor of religious contributions. One is normative, connected with contemporary theories of democracy. Another one is epistemological, which, in turn, exists in two versions: weak or ««modern», represented by Jürgen Habermas and implying the necessity of «translation» of religious contribution into the language of universal secular rationality; and ««strong» or postmodern, implying epistemological equalization of religion and science. Then the article considers concrete historical details of Russian culture (most importantly, its internal binary oppositions), which stipulate the social projection of the dialogue between science and religion in the Russian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Гроций Г. О праве мира и войны. М.: Ладомир, 1994

Докинз Р. Долли и рясоголовые // Докинз Р. Капеллан дьявола: размышления о надежде, лжи, науке и любви. М.: АСТ: Corpus, 2013

Калхун К. Постсекулярность при демократии // Русский журнал. 15.06.2011 [http:// www.russ.ru/layout/ set/print/pole / Postsekulyarnost-pri-demokratii, доступ от 03.11.2013]

Кимлика У. Современная политическая философия: Введение. М.: Изд. дом НИУВШЭ, 2010

Костюк К. История социально-этической мысли в Русской православной церкви. М.: Алетейя, 2013

Лотман Ю. Культура и взрыв // Лотман Ю. Семиосфера. Санкт-Петербург: «Искусство - СПБ», 2000

Макинтайр А. После добродетели: исследования теории морали. М.: Академический проект, 2000

Ролз Дж. Теория справедливости. Новосибирск: Издательство Новосибирского государственного университета, 1995

Ситников А. Православие, институты власти и гражданского общества в России. М.: Алетейя, 2012

Хабермас Ю. Граница между верой и знанием. К истории воздействия и актуальному значению философии религии Канта // Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. Философские статьи. М.: Весь мир, 2011

Хабермас Ю. Против «Воинствующего атеизма» // Русский журнал [http://www.russ. ru/pole/Protiv-voinstvuyuschego-ateizma, доступ от 17.01.2015]

Хабермас Ю. Религия и публичность. Когнитивные предпосылки для «публичного использования разума» религиозных и секулярных граждан // Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. Философские статьи. М.: Весь мир, 2011

Эпштейн М. Религия после атеизма. М.: АСТ-ПРЕСС, 2013

Berger, P. L., Berger, B. and Kellner, H. (1974) The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. N. Y.: Vintage Books

Casanova, J. (1994) Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press

Dokinz, R. (2013) «Dolli i riasogolovye» [Dolly and the Cloth-heads], in Dokinz, R. Kapellan d'iavola: razmyshleniia o nadezhde, lzhi, nauke i liubvi [A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love]. M.: AST: Corpus, 2013

Epshtein, M. (2013) Religiia posle ateizma [Religion after Atheism]. M.: AST-PRESS

Grotsii, G. (1994) O prave mira i voiny [On the Law of War and Peace]. M.: Ladomir

Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society [1962]. Cambridge: Polity

Habermas, J. «A Conversation About God and the World», in Habermas, J. Religion and Rationality. Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity. Polity Press, 2002

Habermas, J. «Transcendence from Within, Transcendence in this World», in Habermas, J. Religion and Rationality. Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity. Polity Press, 2002

Harrington, A. (2007) «Habermas and the ‘Post-Secular Society’”, European Journal of Social Theory 10 (4): 543-560

Kalkhun, K. (2011) «Postsekuliarnost' pri demokratii» [Democratic Postsecularity], Russkii zhurnal 15.06.2011 [http://www.russ.ru/layout/set/print/pole/Postsekulyarnost-pri-demokratii, dostup ot 03.11.2013]

Khabermas, Iu. (2008) «Protiv ‘Voinstvuiushchego ateizma'" [Against «military atheism»], Russkii zhurnal 23.07.2008 [http://www.russ.ru/pole/Protiv-voinstvuyuschego-ateizma, dostup ot 17.01.2015]

Khabermas, Iu. (2011) «Granitsa mezhdu veroi i znaniem. K istorii vozdeistviia i aktual'nomu znacheniiu filosofii religii Kanta» [The Boundary between Faith and Knowledge: On the Reception and Contemporary Importance of Kant's Philosophy of Religion], in Khabermas, Iu. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. Filosofskie stat'I [Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays]. M.: Ves' mir

Khabermas, Iu. (2011) «Religiia i publichnost'. Kognitivnye predposylki dlia ‘publichnogo ispol'zovaniia razuma' religioznykh i sekuliarnykh grazhdan» [Religion in the Public Sphere], in Khabermas, Iu. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. Filosofskie stat'I [Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays]. M.: Ves' mir

Kimlika, U. (2010) Sovremennaia politicheskaia filosofiia: Vvedenie [Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction]. M.: Izd. dom NIU-VShE

Kitcher, F. (2001) Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press

Kitcher, F. (2011) Science in a Democratic Society. Prometheus Books

Kostiuk, K. (2013) Istoriia sotsial'no-eticheskoi mysli v Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi [History of Social-ethical thinking of the Russian Orthodox Church]. M.: Aleteiia

Lotman, Iu. (2000) «Kul'tura i vzryv» [Culture and Explosion], in Lotman, Iu. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Sankt-Peterburg: «Iskusstvo - SPB»

MacIntyre, A. (1988) Whose Justice? What Rationality? Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press

Makintair, A. (2000) Posle dobrodeteli: issledovaniia teorii morali [After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory]. M.: Akademicheskii proekt

Martin, D. (1978) A General Theory of Secularization. Harper and Row

Parsons, T. (1966) «Religion in a Modern Pluralistic Society», Review of Religious Research 7 (3)

Rawls, J. (1985) «Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical», Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3): 223-251

Rawls, J. (1997) «The Idea of Public Reason Revisited», University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765-807

Rolz, Dzh. (1995) Teoriia spravedlivosti [Theory of Justice]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo No-vosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta

Sitnikov, A. (2012) Pravoslavie, instituty vlast i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii [Orthodoxy, Institutions of Power and Civil Society in Russia]. M.: Aleteiia

Sorkin, D. (2008) The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press

Taylor, Ch. (1998) «Modes of Secularism», in R. Bhargava (ed.) Secularism and Its Critics. Oxford University Press

Taylor, Ch. (2011) «What Does Secularism mean», in Taylor, Ch. Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

Young, I. M. (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Downloads

Published

2015-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dmitry U. The Dialogue of Science and Religion from the Perspective of Contemporary Theories of Democracy // State, Religion and Church. 2015. Vol. 33, no. 1. P. 136–163.

Коды статьи

  • EDN SIACFM
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)