The Dialogue of Religion and Science: New Approaches (An Overview of Discussions)

Authors

  • A. Kyrlezhev Res. Fellow of the St. Cyril and Methodius Post-Graduate Institute of the Russian Orthodox Church|Synodal Biblical and Theological Commission of the Russian Orthodox Church Автор
  • A. Shishkov Secretary of the Social Sciences Department|St. Cyril and Methodius Post-Graduate Institute of the Russian Orthodox Church|Consultant of the Synodal Biblical and Theological Commission of the Russian Orthodox Church Автор
  • V. Shmaliy Archpriest|Vice-Rector of the St. Cyril and Methodius Post-Grad. Inst. of the Russ. Orthodox Church|Secretary of the Synodal Biblical and Theological Commission of the ROC|National Research Nuclear University MEPhI Автор

Keywords:

dialogue of religion and science, scientific ethos, religious ethos, theology, types of knowledge, worldview, Post-Soviet transition

Abstract

The paper is authored by the heads of the research project «The Development of a New Methodology for Dialogue and Cooperation between Science and Religion in Russia» (supported by John Templeton Foundation). The paper gives an overview of research results. The traditional dialogue (within Christian cultural tradition), which was largely epistemological, should be made wider and deeper thanks to new approaches - in particular looking comparatively at the very ethos of the scientific and religious communities. This aspect is most significant in Russia given the character of postSoviet transition. Science and religion are not just the two different methods of knowledge but also the two different social institutions and cultural traditions. Now the context of their interaction is the crisis of modern paradigm of functional differentiation of society, as religion acquires wider public acclaim while science loses cultural hegemony. In these new circumstances, the dialogue opens some new perspectives: comparison of metaphysical foundations of both science and religion; exploring macro- and micro-social contexts in the production of scientific and religious knowledge; productive meeting of theology with social/human sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Антонов К. Теология как научная специальность//Вопросы философии. 2012. № 6. С.73-84

История и теория атеизма. Учебное пособие/Баканурский Г. Л., Борунков Ю. Ф., Винокуров В. В., Дмитриева Н. К. и др.; Редкол.: Новиков М. П. (отв. ред.), Овсиенко Ф. Г., Угринович Д. М., Яблоков И. Н. 3-е изд., дораб. М.: Мысль, 1987

Касавин И. Т. Познание//Новая философская энциклопедия. Т. №. 3. М.: Мысль, 2001. С.259-263

Кырлежев А. Постсекулярное: краткая интерпретация//Логос. № 3 (82). 2011. P. 100-106

Кюнг Г. Начало всех вещей. М.: Библейско-богословский институт св. ап. Андрея, 2006. Луман Н. Теория общества. М., 2000

Нестерук А. Логос и космос: Богословие, наука и православное предание. М.: Библейско-богословский институт св. ап. Андрея, 2006

Основы учения Русской православной церкви о достоинстве, свободе и правах человека (http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/428 616.html, доступ от 13.12.2014). Парсонс Т. Система современных обществ. М.: Аспект-пресс, 1998

Теология в системе научного знания и образования. Материалы слушаний в Общественной палате Российской Федерации. М.: Изд. Общественной палаты Российской Федерации, 2008

Узланер Д. Советская модель секуляризации//Социологические исследования. 2010. № 6. 62-69

Шишков А. Некоторые аспекты десекуляризации в постсоветской России//Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2012. № 2. С. 165-177

Antonov, K. (2012) Teologiia kak nauchnaia spetsial'nost' //Voprosy filosofii 6: 73-84

Casanova, J. (1994) Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Istoriia i teoriia ateizma. Uchebnoe posobie (1987) /Bakanurskii G. L., Borunkov Iu. F., Vinokurov V. V., Dmitrieva N. K. i dr.; Redkol.: Novikov M. P. (otv. red.), Ovsienko F. G., Ugrinovich D. M., Iablokov I. N. 3-e izd., dorab. Moscow: Mysl'

Kasavin, I. T. «Poznanie» (2001), in Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia. T. №. 3, pp. 259-263. Moscow: Mysl'

Küng, H. (2006) Nachalo vsekh veshchei . Moscow: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. ap. Andreia, 2006

Kyrlezhev, A. (2011) «Postsekuliarnoe: kratkaia interpretatsiia» , Logos 3 (82): 100-106

Luman, N. (2000) Teoriia obshchestva . Moscow

Nesteruk, A. (2006) Logos i kosmos: Bogoslovie, nauka i pravoslavnoe predanie . Moscow: Bibleisko-bogoslovskii institut sv. ap. Andreia

Nongbri, B. (2013) Before Religion. A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven and London: Yale University Press

Osnovy ucheniia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi o dostoinstve, svobode i pravakh cheloveka (http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/428 616.html, accessed 13.12.2014)

Parsons, T. Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv . Moscow: Aspekt-press, 1998

Shishkov, A. (2012) «Nekotorye aspekty desekuliarizatsii v postsovetskoi Rossii» , Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom 2: 165-177

Teologiia v sisteme nauchnogo znaniia i obrazovaniia. Materialy slushanii v Obshchestvennoi palate Rossiiskoi Federatsii (2008). M.: Izd. Obshchestvennoi palaty Rossiiskoi Federatsii

Uzlaner, D. (2010) «Sovetskaia model' sekuliarizatsii» , Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia 6: 62-69

Downloads

Published

2015-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kyrlezhev A., Shishkov A., Shmaliy V. The Dialogue of Religion and Science: New Approaches (An Overview of Discussions) // State, Religion and Church. 2015. Vol. 33, no. 1. P. 164–183.

Коды статьи

  • EDN UIXFJJ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)