Beyond the Conflict Thesis. Edward Drinker Cope and the Neo-Lamarckian "Compromise" in the 19th Century
Keywords:
neo-Lamarckism, post-Darwinian controversies, teleology, conflict thesis, Edward Drinker Cope, design argument, evolutionAbstract
This essay aims to critically rethink the relation between the historiographical categorizations provided by the “conflict thesis” and the American controversies on evolution by analyzing the construction of biological and theological discourses which featured the works of Edward Drinker Cope, leader of the so-called “American school NeoLamarckism”. As an authority in the American scientific community of the second half of the nineteenth century, Cope set forth a new conceptualization of design in nature based upon the active role displayed by organisms during their life. This assumption, in his own words, implied the reintroduction of theism in nature. Such case study, we argue, represents not only a great testimony of the permeable boundaries which characterized the interaction between scientific and extra-scientific discourses in the 19th century. It also seems to undermine the conflict argument as well as the idea that warfare was the norm in the American reception of Darwinism.Downloads
References
Bain, A. (1872) Mind and Body. The Theories of their Relation. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Bergson, H. (1922) Creative Evolution. London: MacMillan and Co.
Bowler, P.J. (1976) Fossils and Progress. Paleontology and the Idea of Progressive Evolution in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Science History Publications.
Bowler, P.J. (1977) “Edward Drinker Cope and the Changing Structure of Evolutionary Theory”, Isis 68(2): 249-265.
Bowler, P.J. (1983) The Eclipse of Darwinism. Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimora: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, P.J. (1985) “Scientific Attitudes to Darwinism in Britain and America”, in Kohn, D. (ed.) The Darwinian Heritage, pp. 641-681. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Continenza, B. (1999) “Jean Baptiste Lamarck: Uno sguardo alla teoria dell’evoluzione at-traverso gli occhi di un ‘capro espiatorio’”, in Capire la vita. Modelli matematici e teorie qualitative, pp. 65-101. Ancona: peQuod editore.
Cope, E.D. (1871) “The Laws of Organic Development”, The American Naturalist 5(8/9): 593-608.
Cope, E.D. (1887) The Origin of the Fittest. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Cope, E.D. (1887) Theology of Evolution. Philadelphia: Arnold and Company.
Cope, E.D. (1889) “The Descent of Man”, in Evolution: Popular Lectures and Discussions before the Brooklyn Ethical Association, pp. 159-170. Boston: James H. West.
Cope, E.D., (1896) The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
Darwin, C.R. (1887) Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, in Darwin, F. (ed.). Vol. II. London: John Murray.
Davidson, J.P. (1997) The Bone Sharp. The Life of Edward Drinker Cope. Philadelphia: Ac. Nat. Sc. Phil.
Dewey, J. (1910) The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 53. White, A. D. The Warfare of Science, pp. 7-8
Draper, J.W. (1875) History of the Conflict between Religion and Science. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Gould, S.J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Greenfield, T.J. (1986) Variation, Heredity, and Scientific Explanation in the Evolutionary Theory of Four American Neo-Lamarckians, 1867-1897. Ph.D diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Hodge, C. (1874) What is Darwinism? New York: Scribner, Armstrong, and Company.
Jaffe, M. (2000) The Gilded Dinosaur: The Fossil War Between E.D. Cope and O.C. Marsh and the Rise of American Science. New York: Crown.
Laats, A. (2010) Fundamentalism and Education in the Scopes Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McPherson, T. (1972) The Argument from Design. London: Macmillan.
Montgomery, E. (1887) “Cope’s Theology of Evolution”, The Open Court 1(6): 160-164.
Moore, J.R. (1979) The Post-Darwinian Controversies. A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Numbers, R.L. (1998) Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Osborn, H.F. (1931) Cope: Master Naturalist. Life and Letters of Edward Drinker Cope, with a Bibliography of his Writings classified by Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Packard, A.S. (1876) “A Century’s Progress in American Zoology”, The American Naturalist 10(10): 591-598.
Packard, A.S. (1884) "On Inheritance of Acquired Characters in Animals with a Complete Metamorphosis", Proc. Am. Acad. Arts & Sci 29: 331-370.
Packard, A.S.; Cope, E.D. (1886) “Editors’ Table”, The American Naturalist 20(8): 708-710.
Pfeifer, E.J. (1965) “The Genesis of American Neo-Lamarckism”, Isis 56(2): 156-167.
Roberts, J.H. (2001) “Darwinism American Protestant Thinkers and the Puzzle of Motivation”, in Numbers R.L., Stenhouse, J. (eds) Disseminating Darwinism: The Role of Place, Race, Religion and Gender, pp. 145-172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, W. H. (1946) A History of American Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
White, A.D. (1877) The Warfare of Science. 2nd edition. London: Henry S. King & Co.
White, A.D. (1896) A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. vol. I. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN VMNDTB
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
