The Relational Dimension of the Problem of Evil, and the Mystical Theodicy

Authors

  • Bogdan Faul Saint-Petersburg State University Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-125-141

Keywords:

problem of evil, anti-theodicy, existential problem of evil, relational trauma, christianity, religious experience, theism

Abstract

In this article, the author examines the problem of evil from the perspective of the antitheodicy, which is based on a critique of traditional approaches to the problem of evil. The article demonstrates the foundations of the antitheodicy and offers identification of the existential dimension of the problem of evil within the framework of religious life, expressed in the concept of “theological relational trauma”. From this perspective, the existential root of the problem of evil within the religious life consists in the discovery of the inability of an individual to love God. The author demonstrates how theoretical reflection on the problem of evil depends on the existential experience. The article also offers two solutions to the problem of evil, which are based on what can be characterized, under certain assumptions, as mystical experience. The author highlights the phenomenological properties of this mystical experience and demonstrates that it provides a solution to the existential problem of evil in the spirit of antitheodicy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Карпов К. В. Теодицея как этическая проблема // Философский журнал. 2020. Том 13. № 2. С. 35-48.

Adams, M. M. (2000) Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Betenson, T. (2016) "Anti-Theodicy", Philosophy Compass 11(1): 56-65.

Burrell, D. (2008) Deconstructing Theodicy: Why Job Has Nothing to Say to the Puzzle of Suffering. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.

Evans, C. S. (2019) Kierkegaard and Spirituality: Accountability as the Meaning of Human Existence. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Frankfurt, H. G. (2006) The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Frankfurt, H. G. (2006) Taking Ourselves Seriously & Getting It Right. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.

Gelinas, L. (2009) "The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies", Philosophy Compass 4 (3): 533-559.

Gleeson, A. (2012) A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan.

Greenberg, I. (1977) "Cloud of Smoke, Pillar of Fire: Judaism, Christianity, and Modernity After the Holocaust", in Fleischner, E. (ed.) Auschwitz: Beginning of a New Era? Reflections on the Holocaust: Papers Given at the International Symposium on the Holocaust, Held at the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine, pp. 7-55. New York: KTAV Publishing House.

Kraay, K. J. (2016) "God and gratuitous evil (Part I)", Philosophy Compass 11(12): 905-912.

Lewis, C. S., L'Engle, M. (2001) A Grief Observed. San Francisco: HarperOne.

Neiman, S. (2015) Evil in Modern Thought - An Alternative History of Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Phillips, D. Z. (2004) The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. London: SCM Press.

Surin, K. (2004) Theology and the Problem of Evil. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.

Tilley, T. W. (2000) The Evils of Theodicy. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.

Trakakis, N. N. (2013) "Antitheodicy", in J. P. McBrayer, D. Howard-Snyder (eds) The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, pp. 363-376. Wiley-Blackwell: John Wiley & Sons Limited.

Trakakis, N. (2009) The End of Philosophy of Religion. London, New York: Continuum.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Faul B. The Relational Dimension of the Problem of Evil, and the Mystical Theodicy // State, Religion and Church. 2021. Vol. 39, no. 4. P. 125–141. https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2021-39-4-125-141

Коды статьи

  • EDN TVWKOJ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)