КОНЦЕПТ "ИСТОРИЯ ВИГОВ" В НОВОЙ ИСТОРИОГРАФИИ НАУЧНОЙ РЕВОЛЮЦИИ
Ключевые слова:
история вигов, презентизм, научная революция, наука и религия, история наукиАннотация
Статья посвящена проблеме использования концепта «история вигов» в «новой» историографии Научной революции. Автор показывает, что использование концепта «история вигов» в рамках «новой» историографии имеет инструментальный характер и направлено на развенчание «презентистской» и «прогрессистской» установок «старой» историографии. Заключая статью, автор указывает на невозможность отказа от классических научных категорий в исследованиях по истории науки.Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Кузнецова Н. И. Презентизм и антикваризм как дилемма историко-научного исследования // Познание социальной реальности. Теория познания. Т. 4. М., 1995.
Латур Б. Нового времени не было. Эссе по симметричной антропологии. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского Университета, 2006.
Ashplant T. G., Wilson A. Present-Centered History and the Problem of Historical Knowledge // The Historical Journal. 1988. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 253-275.
Ashplant T G., Wilson A. Whig History and Present Centered History // The Historical Journal. 1988. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 1-16.
Beiser F C. The German Historicist Tradition. New-York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Berlin I. History and Theory: The Concept of Scientific History // History and Theory. 1960. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1-31.
Brooke J. H. Presidential Address: Does the History of Science Have a Future? // The British Journal for the History of Science. 1999. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 1-20.
Butterfield H. Whig Interpretation of History. London: G. Bell, 1931.
Cohen B. The Eighteenth-Century Origins of the Concept of Scientific Revolution // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1976. Vol. 37. P. 257-288.
Cohen H. F. The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Enquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Christie J. R. R. The Development of the Historiography of Science // Companion to the History of Modern Science. London: Routledge, 1996. P. 5-22.
Cunningham A. The Identity of Natural Philosophy. A Response to Edward Grant // Early Science and Medicine. 2000. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 259-278.
Cunningham A. How the Principia Got Its Name or Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously // History of Science. 1991. Vol. 29. P. 377-392.
Cunningham A., Williams P. De-Centring the «Big Picture»: «The origins of Modern Science» and the Modern Origins of Science // The British Journal for the History of Science. 1993. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 407-432.
Westfall R. The Scientific Revolution Reasserted // Rethinking Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 51.
Dobbs B. Newton as Final Cause and First Mover // Rethinking Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 25-40.
Forman P. Independence, Not Transcendence for the Historian of Science // Isis. 1991. Vol. 82. P. 71-86.
Grant E. The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages. Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectuals Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Grant E. God and Natural Philosophy: The Late Middle Ages and Sir Isaac Newton // Early Science and Medicine. 2000. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 279-298.
Hall A. R. On Whiggism // History of Science. 1983. Vol. 21. P. 45-59.
Harrison E. Whigs, Prigs and Historians of Science // Nature. 1987. Vol. 329. P. 213-214.
Harrison P. «Science» and «Religion»: Constructing the Boundaries // The Journal of Religion. 2006. Vol. 86. No. 1. P. 81-106.
Henry J. The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2002.
Hull D. In Defense of Presentism // History and Theory. 1979. Vol. 18. P. 1-15.
Jardine N. Whigs and Stories: Herbert Butterfield and the Historiography of Science // History of Science. 2003. Vol. 41. P. 125-140.
Lindberg D., Westman R. Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Mayr Е. When Is Historiography Whiggish? // Journal of the History of Ideas. 1990. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 301-309.
McGuire J. E., Rattansi P. M. Newton and the «Pipes of Pan» // Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 1966. Vol. 21. No. 2. P. 138.
Novick P. That Noble Dream: The «Objectivity» Quetsion and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Osler M. J. The Canonical Imperative: Rethinking the Scientific Revolution // Rethinking Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 3-24.
Osler M. J. Mixing Metaphors: Science and Religion or Natural Philosophy and Theology in Early Modem Europe // History of Science. 1998. Vol. 36. P. 91-113.
Osler M. Religion and the Changing Historiography of the Scientific Revolution // Science and Religion. New Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 71-86.
Porter R. The Scientific Revolution: A Spoke in the Wheel // Revolution in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. P. 290-316.
Sarton G. A Guide to the History of Science. Waltham, 1952. Shapin S. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Schuster J. The Problem of Whig History in the History of Science // The Scientific Revolution: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science. Wollongong, 1995.
Snobelen S. Isaac Newton: His Science and Religion // Science, Religion, and Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Controversy. Vol. 1. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 2007. P. 355-369.
Trevelyan G. M. Clio, a Muse, and Other Essays Literary and Pedestrian. London: Longmans Green and Co., 1913.
Westfall R. The Scientific Revolution Reasserted // Rethinking Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 41-55.
Wilson D. B. On the Importance of Eliminating Science and Religion from the History of Science and Religion // Facets of Faith and Science. Vol. 1. The Pascal Centre for Advanced Studies in Faith and Science: University Press of America, 1996. P. 27-47.
Zagorin P. Historiography and Postmodernism: Reconsiderations // History and Theory. 1990. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 263-274.
Zagorin P. History, the Referent, and Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism Now // History and Theory. 1999. Vol. 38. P. 1-24.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
Коды статьи
- EDN QUUVIT
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
