The "Conflict Thesis" and Scientific Naturalism
Keywords:
Thomas Henry Huxley, John Tyndall, Herbert Spencer, evolution, conflict thesis, complexity thesis, natural theology, theodicy, eschatology, James Moore, Frank Turner, Geoffrey CantorAbstract
The zoologist Thomas Henry Huxley, along with his friends, physicist John Tyndall and evolutionist philosopher Herbert Spencer have been central to all accounts of the history of science-religion relationships in the 19th century. Before 1970s, when the “conflict thesis" widely dominated, these “scientific naturalists” were presented as heroes of science, courageous defenders of the theory of evolution from the assaults of Christian reactionaries. However, from 1970s on, the historians started to question the “conflict thesis”, and a new, “complexity thesis” has been formulated. The real position of Huxley and his colleagues turned out to be unclear in this new historiographic perspective: can we extend the “complexity thesis” to their thought? This paper is trying to find an uneasy answer to this question.Downloads
References
Barton, R. (1983) “Evolution: The Whitworth Gun in Huxley’s War for the Liberation of Science from Theology”, in D. Oldroyd and I. Langham (eds) The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought, pp. 261-287. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Barton, R. (2014) “Sunday Lecture Societies: Naturalistic Scientists, Unitarians, and Secularists Unite Against Sabbatarian Legislation”, in G. Dawson and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 189-219. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bibby, C. (1960) T. H. Huxley: Scientist, Humanist and Educator. New York: Horizon Press.
Bowler, P. J. (1983) The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, P. J. (1988) The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cantor, G. (2010) “What Shall We Do with the ‘Conflict Thesis’?”, in Dixon, Th., Cantor, G. and Pumfrey, S. (eds) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives, pp. 283-298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawson, G. (2007) Darwin, Literature and Victorian Respectability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmond, A. (1989) The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Dixon, Th., Cantor, G. and Pumfrey, S. (eds) (2010) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Endersby, J. (2014) “Odd Man Out: Was Joseph Hooker an Evolutionary Naturalist?”, in G. Dawson and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 157-185. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huxley, L. (ed.) (1900) Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2 vols. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1892) “An Apologetic Irenicon”, Fortnightly Review 58.
Huxley, T. H. (1899) Darwiniana. Macmillan & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1892) Essays upon Some Controverted Questions. London: Macmillan.
Huxley, T. H. (1897) Method and Results. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1888) “On the Reception of the ‘Origin of Species’”, in Francis Darwin (ed.) The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols. London: John Murray.
[Huxley, T. H.] (1864) "Science and ‘Church Policy'", Reader 4 (Dec. 31).
Huxley, T. H. (1914) Science and Hebrew Tradition. London: Macmillan & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1909) Science and Christian Tradition. London: Macmillan & Co.
[Huxley, T. H.] (1859) "Science and Religion", The Builder.
Lightman, B. (1987) The Origins of Agnosticism: Victorian Unbelief and the Limits of Knowledge. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lightman, B. (1990) “‘Robert Elsmere’ and the Agnostic Crises of Faith”, in R. Helmstadter and
B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth Century Religious Belief, pp. 283-311. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; London: Macmillan Press.
Lightman, B. (2001) “Victorian Sciences and Religions: Discordant Harmonies”, Osiris 16: 343-366.
Moore, J. R. (1979) The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, J. R. (1990) “Theodicy and Society: The Crisis of the Intelligentsia”, in R. Helmstadter and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth Century Religious Belief, pp. 153-186. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; London: Macmillan Press
Neswald, E. (2014) “Saving the World in an Age of Entropy: John Tyndall and the Second Law of Thermodynamics”, in B. Lightman and M. Reidy (eds) The Age of Scientific Naturalism: John Tyndall and His Contemporaries, pp. 15-31. London: Pickering and Chatto.
Numbers, R. L. (2010) “Simplifying Complexity: Patterns in the History of Science and Religion”, in Th. Dixon, G. Cantor, and S. Pumfrey (eds) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives, pp. 263-282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
RI-TP (Royal Institution - Tyndall Papers). Correspondence between Thomas Archer Hirst and John Tyndall, 16. (R.I. MSS T., 31/B4, 12)
RI-TP (Royal Institution - Tyndall Papers). Typescript Bound Journals of T. A. Hirst, vol. 1
Spencer, H. (1896) Social Statics, Abridged and Revised; Together with The Man Versus the State. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Spencer, H. (1882) First Principles of a New System of Philosophy. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Stanley, M. (2015) Huxley's Church and Maxwell's Demon: From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, F. M. (1974) Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Turner, F. M. (1993) Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, F. M. (1978) “The Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion: A Professional Dimension”, Isis 69: 356-376.
Tyndall, J. (1892) Fragments of Science, 2 vols, 8th edn. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Tyndall, J. (1863) Heat as a Mode of Motion, pp. 419-423. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green.
Taylor, M. W. (2014) “Herbert Spencer and the Metaphysical Roots of Evolutionary Naturalism”, in Bernard Lightman and Michael Reidy (eds) The Age of Scientific Naturalism: John Tyndall and His Contemporaries, pp. 71-88. London: Pickering and Chatto.
White, P. (2014) “The Conduct of Belief: Agnosticism, the Metaphysical Society, and the Formation of Intellectual Communities”, in Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 220-241. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Young, R. (1985) Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN VMNDSR
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
