How to Study Muslim Identity in Today’s World? Dietrich Jung’s Sociology of Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2023-41-3-4-564-585Keywords:
Dietrich Jung, identity, subjectivity, muslim world, modernity, islamAbstract
The review is focused on the analysis of Dietrich Jung’s approach to the sociology of Islam. Two fundamental works under Jung’s supervision are discussed, starting with a theoretical model by Jung and his co-authors and looking at its implications for the existing sociological research. The authors analyze the internal homogeneity and consistency of this theoretical model. The main argument of the article is the fact that Jung’s elaborated theoretical model does not necessarily correspond to epistemological and methodological foundations of various studies included in the collective works edited by Jung. This fact is demonstrated, in particular, by analyzing the methodological framework of the articles included in the book “Muslim Subjectivities in Global Modernity”.Downloads
References
Бергер П. Приглашение в социологию. М.: Аспект-Пресс, серия «Гуманистическая перспектива», 1963.
Гофман И. Представление себя другим в повседневной жизни (пер. с англ. и вступ. статья А. Д. Ковалева). М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц, Кучково поле, 2000.
Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Arjomand, S.A. (1988) The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Bedau, M.A. (1997) “Weak Emergence”, Philosophical Perspectives: Mind, Causation, and World 11: 375–399.
Berger, P. (1963) Priglashenie v sotsiologiiu [An Introduction to Sociology]. Moskva: Aspekt-Press.
Choueiri, Y.M. (2002) “Review: The Middle East: Colonialism, Islam and the Nation State”, Journal of Contemporary History 34(4): 649–663.
Cooper, K., White, R.E. (2011) Qualitative Research in the PostModern Era. Contexts of Qualitative Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Geddes, B. (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Goffman, I. (2000) Predstavlenie sebia drugim v povsednevnoĭ zhizni [The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life]. M.: Kanon-Press-TS, Kuchkovo pole.
Hall, S. (2011) “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?”, in S. Hall, P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity, pp. 1–17. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Harre, R. (1979) Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell.
Irfan, H. (1982) The Cambridge Economic History of India: Volume 1. C. 1200 — c. 1750. Cambridge University Press.
Jung, D. (2023) Islam in Global Modernity. Sociological Theory and the Diversity of Islamic Modernities. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Jung, D., Sinclair, K. (eds) (2020) Muslim Subjectivities in Global Modernity: Islamic Traditions and the Construction of Modern Muslim Identities. Leiden: Brill.
Rhodes, R.A.W., Hart, P., Noordegraaf, M. (2007) “So What? The Benefits and Pitfalls of Being There”, in Rhodes, R.A.W., Hart, P., Noordegraaf, M. (eds) Observing Government Elites, pp. 206–233. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneider, I. (2001) “Ebussuud“, in M. Stolleis (ed.) Juristen: ein biographisches Lexikon; von der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert (2nd ed.), pp. 192–193. München: Beck.
Žižek, S. (2019) “The Fall That Makes Us Like God, Part I”, The Philosophical Salon [https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/the-fall-that-makes-us-like-god-part-i/, accessed on 5.10.2023].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andriyanov D., Bragina A., Kasenova Z., Chebanova D.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN ZCDZJL
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Обзорная статья (Обзорная статья)
