"Тезис о конфликте" и научный натурализм
Ключевые слова:
научный натурализм, Томас Генри Гексли, Джон Тиндаль, Герберт Спенсер, эволюция, тезис о конфликте, тезис о сложности, естественная теология, теодицея, эсхатология, Джеймс Мур, Фрэнк Тернер, Джеффри КанторАннотация
Зоолог Томас Гексли, физик Джон Тиндаль и философ-эволюционист Герберт Спенсер были центральными фигурами в истории отношений науки и религии в Британии XIX в. До 1970-х гг., когда «тезис о конфликте» (между наукой и религией) был в широком хождении, они представлялись героями науки, отчаянно защищавшими Дарвина от нападок христианских антиэволюционистов. Начиная с 1970-х гг. историки XIX в. начали подвергать сомнению состоятельность «тезиса о конфликте»; был сформулирован новый подход - «тезис о сложности». Конкретное место Гексли и его коллег в этой новой историографической перспективе оказалось неясным. Распространяется ли на них переход от «тезиса о конфликте» к «тезису о сложности»? Эта статья пытается найти ответ на этот вопрос, анализируя подходы к нему многих исследователей.Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Barton, R. (1983) “Evolution: The Whitworth Gun in Huxley’s War for the Liberation of Science from Theology”, in D. Oldroyd and I. Langham (eds) The Wider Domain of Evolutionary Thought, pp. 261-287. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Barton, R. (2014) “Sunday Lecture Societies: Naturalistic Scientists, Unitarians, and Secularists Unite Against Sabbatarian Legislation”, in G. Dawson and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 189-219. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bibby, C. (1960) T. H. Huxley: Scientist, Humanist and Educator. New York: Horizon Press.
Bowler, P. J. (1983) The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, P. J. (1988) The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cantor, G. (2010) “What Shall We Do with the ‘Conflict Thesis’?”, in Dixon, Th., Cantor, G. and Pumfrey, S. (eds) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives, pp. 283-298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawson, G. (2007) Darwin, Literature and Victorian Respectability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desmond, A. (1989) The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Dixon, Th., Cantor, G. and Pumfrey, S. (eds) (2010) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Endersby, J. (2014) “Odd Man Out: Was Joseph Hooker an Evolutionary Naturalist?”, in G. Dawson and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 157-185. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huxley, L. (ed.) (1900) Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, 2 vols. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1892) “An Apologetic Irenicon”, Fortnightly Review 58.
Huxley, T. H. (1899) Darwiniana. Macmillan & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1892) Essays upon Some Controverted Questions. London: Macmillan.
Huxley, T. H. (1897) Method and Results. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1888) “On the Reception of the ‘Origin of Species’”, in Francis Darwin (ed.) The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols. London: John Murray.
[Huxley, T. H.] (1864) "Science and ‘Church Policy'", Reader 4 (Dec. 31).
Huxley, T. H. (1914) Science and Hebrew Tradition. London: Macmillan & Co.
Huxley, T. H. (1909) Science and Christian Tradition. London: Macmillan & Co.
[Huxley, T. H.] (1859) "Science and Religion", The Builder.
Lightman, B. (1987) The Origins of Agnosticism: Victorian Unbelief and the Limits of Knowledge. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lightman, B. (1990) “‘Robert Elsmere’ and the Agnostic Crises of Faith”, in R. Helmstadter and
B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth Century Religious Belief, pp. 283-311. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; London: Macmillan Press.
Lightman, B. (2001) “Victorian Sciences and Religions: Discordant Harmonies”, Osiris 16: 343-366.
Moore, J. R. (1979) The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, J. R. (1990) “Theodicy and Society: The Crisis of the Intelligentsia”, in R. Helmstadter and B. Lightman (eds) Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth Century Religious Belief, pp. 153-186. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; London: Macmillan Press
Neswald, E. (2014) “Saving the World in an Age of Entropy: John Tyndall and the Second Law of Thermodynamics”, in B. Lightman and M. Reidy (eds) The Age of Scientific Naturalism: John Tyndall and His Contemporaries, pp. 15-31. London: Pickering and Chatto.
Numbers, R. L. (2010) “Simplifying Complexity: Patterns in the History of Science and Religion”, in Th. Dixon, G. Cantor, and S. Pumfrey (eds) Science and Religion: New Historical Perspectives, pp. 263-282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
RI-TP (Royal Institution - Tyndall Papers). Correspondence between Thomas Archer Hirst and John Tyndall, 16. (R.I. MSS T., 31/B4, 12)
RI-TP (Royal Institution - Tyndall Papers). Typescript Bound Journals of T. A. Hirst, vol. 1
Spencer, H. (1896) Social Statics, Abridged and Revised; Together with The Man Versus the State. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Spencer, H. (1882) First Principles of a New System of Philosophy. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Stanley, M. (2015) Huxley's Church and Maxwell's Demon: From Theistic Science to Naturalistic Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, F. M. (1974) Between Science and Religion: The Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Turner, F. M. (1993) Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, F. M. (1978) “The Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion: A Professional Dimension”, Isis 69: 356-376.
Tyndall, J. (1892) Fragments of Science, 2 vols, 8th edn. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Tyndall, J. (1863) Heat as a Mode of Motion, pp. 419-423. London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts & Green.
Taylor, M. W. (2014) “Herbert Spencer and the Metaphysical Roots of Evolutionary Naturalism”, in Bernard Lightman and Michael Reidy (eds) The Age of Scientific Naturalism: John Tyndall and His Contemporaries, pp. 71-88. London: Pickering and Chatto.
White, P. (2014) “The Conduct of Belief: Agnosticism, the Metaphysical Society, and the Formation of Intellectual Communities”, in Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, pp. 220-241. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Young, R. (1985) Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
Коды статьи
- EDN VMNDSR
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
